Publications

2020
Andrews Akwasi Agbleke, Assaf Amitai, Jason D Buenrostro, Aditi Chakrabarti, Lingluo Chu, Anders S Hansen, Kristen M Koenig, Ajay S Labade, Sirui Liu, Tadasu Nozaki, and others. 2020. “Advances in chromatin and chromosome research: perspectives from multiple fields.” Molecular Cell.
Haitham A Shaban and Andrew Seeber. 2020. “Monitoring global chromatin dynamics in response to DNA damage.” Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, Pp. 111707.
Haitham A Shaban and Andrew Seeber. 2020. “Monitoring the spatio-temporal organization and dynamics of the genome.” Nucleic Acids Research, 48, 7, Pp. 3423–3434.
Romain Forey, Antoine Barthe, Mireille Tittel-Elmer, Maxime Wery, Marie-Bénédicte Barrault, Cécile Ducrot, Andrew Seeber, Nils Krietenstein, Ugo Szachnowski, Magdalena Skrzypczak, and others. 2020. “A Role for the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 Complex in Gene Expression and Chromosome Organization.” Molecular cell.
Anaıs Cheblal, Kiran Challa, Andrew Seeber, Kenji Shimada, Haruka Yoshida, Helder C Ferreira, Assaf Amitai, and Susan M Gasser. 2020. “DNA Damage-Induced Nucleosome Depletion Enhances Homology Search Independently of Local Break Movement.” Molecular Cell, 80, 2, Pp. 311–326.
2019
Daphne S Cabianca, Celia Muñoz-Jiménez, Véronique Kalck, Dimos Gaidatzis, Jan Padeken, Andrew Seeber, Peter Askjaer, and Susan M Gasser. 2019. “Active chromatin marks drive spatial sequestration of heterochromatin in C. elegans nuclei.” Nature, 569, 7758, Pp. 734-739.Abstract
The execution of developmental programs of gene expression requires an accurate partitioning of the genome into subnuclear compartments, with active euchromatin enriched centrally and silent heterochromatin at the nuclear periphery. The existence of degenerative diseases linked to lamin A mutations suggests that perinuclear binding of chromatin contributes to cell-type integrity. The methylation of lysine 9 of histone H3 (H3K9me) characterizes heterochromatin and mediates both transcriptional repression and chromatin anchoring at the inner nuclear membrane. In Caenorhabditis elegans embryos, chromodomain protein CEC-4 bound to the inner nuclear membrane tethers heterochromatin through H3K9me, whereas in differentiated tissues, a second heterochromatin-sequestering pathway is induced. Here we use an RNA interference screen in the cec-4 background and identify MRG-1 as a broadly expressed factor that is necessary for this second chromatin anchor in intestinal cells. However, MRG-1 is exclusively bound to euchromatin, suggesting that it acts indirectly. Heterochromatin detachment in double mrg-1; cec-4 mutants is rescued by depleting the histone acetyltransferase CBP-1/p300 or the transcription factor ATF-8, a member of the bZIP family (which is known to recruit CBP/p300). Overexpression of CBP-1 in cec-4 mutants is sufficient to delocalize heterochromatin in an ATF-8-dependent manner. CBP-1 and H3K27ac levels increase in heterochromatin upon mrg-1 knockdown, coincident with delocalization. This suggests that the spatial organization of chromatin in C. elegans is regulated both by the direct perinuclear attachment of silent chromatin, and by an active retention of CBP-1/p300 in euchromatin. The two pathways contribute differentially in embryos and larval tissues, with CBP-1 sequestration by MRG-1 having a major role in differentiated cells.
O Shukron, A Seeber, A Amitai, and D Holcman. 2019. “Advances Using Single-Particle Trajectories to Reconstruct Chromatin Organization and Dynamics.” Trends Genet, 35, 9, Pp. 685-705.Abstract
Chromatin organization remains complex and far from understood. In this article, we review recent statistical methods of extracting biophysical parameters from in vivo single-particle trajectories of loci to reconstruct chromatin reorganization in response to cellular stress such as DNA damage. We look at methods for analyzing both single locus and multiple loci tracked simultaneously and explain how to quantify and describe chromatin motion using a combination of extractable parameters. These parameters can be converted into information about chromatin dynamics and function. Furthermore, we discuss how the timescale of recurrent encounter between loci can be extracted and interpreted. We also discuss the effect of sampling rate on the estimated parameters. Finally, we review a polymer method to reconstruct chromatin structure using crosslinkers between chromatin sites. We list and refer to some software packages that are now publicly available to simulate polymer motion. To conclude, chromatin organization and dynamics can be reconstructed from locus trajectories and predicted based on polymer models.
Susan M Gasser, Andrew Seeber, and Michael Hermann Hauer. 2019. “Methods for increasing the frequency of gene targeting by chromatin modification”.
Roxanne Oshidari, Karim Mekhail, and Andrew Seeber. 2019. “Mobility and Repair of Damaged DNA: Random or Directed?” Trends Cell Biol.Abstract
The increased mobility of damaged DNA within the nucleus can promote genome stability and cell survival. New cell biology approaches have indicated that damaged DNA mobility exhibits random and directed movements during DNA repair. Here, we review recent studies that collectively reveal that cooperation between different molecular mechanisms, which underlie increases in the random and directional motion of damaged DNA, can promote genome repair. We also review the latest approaches that can be used to distinguish between random and directed motions of damaged DNA or other biological molecules. Detailed understanding of the mechanisms behind the increased motion of damaged DNA within the nucleus will reveal more of the secrets of genome organization and stability while potentially pointing to novel research and therapeutic tools.
O Shukron, A Seeber, A Amitai, and D Holcman. 2019. “Single particle trajectory statistic to reconstruct chromatin organization and dynamics.” bioRxiv, Pp. 559369.
2018
Isabella Marcomini, Kenji Shimada, Neda Delgoshaie, Io Yamamoto, Andrew Seeber, Anais Cheblal, Chihiro Horigome, Ulrike Naumann, and Susan M Gasser. 2018. “Asymmetric Processing of DNA Ends at a Double-Strand Break Leads to Unconstrained Dynamics and Ectopic Translocation.” Cell Rep, 24, 10, Pp. 2614-2628.e4.Abstract
Multiple pathways regulate the repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) to suppress potentially dangerous ectopic recombination. Both sequence and chromatin context are thought to influence pathway choice between non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homology-driven recombination. To test the effect of repetitive sequences on break processing, we have inserted TG-rich repeats on one side of an inducible DSB at the budding yeast MAT locus on chromosome III. Five clustered Rap1 sites within a break-proximal TG repeat are sufficient to block Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 recruitment, impair resection, and favor elongation by telomerase. The two sides of the break lose end-to-end tethering and show enhanced, uncoordinated movement. Only the TG-free side is resected and shifts to the nuclear periphery. In contrast to persistent DSBs without TG repeats that are repaired by imprecise NHEJ, nearly all survivors of repeat-proximal DSBs repair the break by a homology-driven, non-reciprocal translocation from ChrIII-R to ChrVII-L. This suppression of imprecise NHEJ at TG-repeat-flanked DSBs requires the Uls1 translocase activity.
Andrew Seeber, Michael H Hauer, and Susan M Gasser. 2018. “Chromosome Dynamics in Response to DNA Damage.” Annu Rev Genet.Abstract
Recent advances in both the technologies used to measure chromatin movement and the biophysical analysis used to model them have yielded a fuller understanding of chromatin dynamics and the polymer structure that underlies it. Changes in nucleosome packing, checkpoint kinase activation, the cell cycle, chromosomal tethers, and external forces acting on nuclei in response to external and internal stimuli can alter the basal mobility of DNA in interphase nuclei of yeast or mammalian cells. Although chromatin movement is assumed to be necessary for many DNA-based processes, including gene activation by distal enhancer-promoter interaction or sequence-based homology searches during double-strand break repair, experimental evidence supporting an essential role in these activities is sparse. Nonetheless, highresolution tracking of chromatin dynamics has led to instructive models of the higher-order folding and flexibility of the chromatin polymer. Key regulators of chromatin motion in undamaged conditions or after damage induction are reviewed here. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Genetics Volume 52 is November 23, 2018. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
Assaf Amitai, Ofir Shukron, Andrew Seeber, and David Holcman. 2018. “Local decondensation at double-stranded DNA breaks modifies chromatin at long distances and reduces encounter times during homology search.” bioRxiv, Pp. 508689.
2017
Andrew Seeber and Susan M Gasser. 2017. “Chromatin organization and dynamics in double-strand break repair.” Curr Opin Genet Dev, 43, Pp. 9-16.Abstract
Chromatin is organized and segmented into a landscape of domains that serve multiple purposes. In contrast to transcription, which is controlled by defined sequences at distinct sites, DNA damage can occur anywhere. Repair accordingly must occur everywhere, yet it is inevitably affected by its chromatin environment. In this review, we summarize recent work investigating how changes in chromatin organization facilitate and/or guide DNA double-strand break repair. In addition, we examine new live cell studies on the dynamics of chromatin and the mechanisms that regulate its movement.
Michael H Hauer, Andrew Seeber, Vijender Singh, Raphael Thierry, Ragna Sack, Assaf Amitai, Mariya Kryzhanovska, Jan Eglinger, David Holcman, Tom Owen-Hughes, and Susan M Gasser. 2017. “Histone degradation in response to DNA damage enhances chromatin dynamics and recombination rates.” Nat Struct Mol Biol, 24, 2, Pp. 99-107.Abstract
Nucleosomes are essential for proper chromatin organization and the maintenance of genome integrity. Histones are post-translationally modified and often evicted at sites of DNA breaks, facilitating the recruitment of repair factors. Whether such chromatin changes are localized or genome-wide is debated. Here we show that cellular levels of histones drop 20-40% in response to DNA damage. This histone loss occurs from chromatin, is proteasome-mediated and requires both the DNA damage checkpoint and the INO80 nucleosome remodeler. We confirmed reductions in histone levels by stable isotope labeling of amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)-based mass spectrometry, genome-wide nucleosome mapping and fluorescence microscopy. Chromatin decompaction and increased fiber flexibility accompanied histone degradation, both in response to DNA damage and after artificial reduction of histone levels. As a result, recombination rates and DNA-repair focus turnover were enhanced. Thus, we propose that a generalized reduction in nucleosome occupancy is an integral part of the DNA damage response in yeast that provides mechanisms for enhanced chromatin mobility and homology search.
Michael H Hauer, Andrew Seeber, Vijender Singh, Raphael Thierry, Assaf Amitai, Jan Eglinger, David Holcman, Tom Owen-Hughes, and Susan M Gasser. 2017. “Histone degradation in response to DNA damage triggers general chromatin decompaction.” Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 24, 2, Pp. 99–107.
Ishan Deshpande, Andrew Seeber, Kenji Shimada, Jeremy J Keusch, Heinz Gut, and Susan M Gasser. 2017. “Structural Basis of Mec1-Ddc2-RPA Assembly and Activation on Single-Stranded DNA at Sites of Damage.” Mol Cell, 68, 2, Pp. 431-445.e5.Abstract
Mec1-Ddc2 (ATR-ATRIP) is a key DNA-damage-sensing kinase that is recruited through the single-stranded (ss) DNA-binding replication protein A (RPA) to initiate the DNA damage checkpoint response. Activation of ATR-ATRIP in the absence of DNA damage is lethal. Therefore, it is important that damage-specific recruitment precedes kinase activation, which is achieved at least in part by Mec1-Ddc2 homodimerization. Here, we report a structural, biochemical, and functional characterization of the yeast Mec1-Ddc2-RPA assembly. High-resolution co-crystal structures of Ddc2-Rfa1 and Ddc2-Rfa1-t11 (K45E mutant) N termini and of the Ddc2 coiled-coil domain (CCD) provide insight into Mec1-Ddc2 homodimerization and damage-site targeting. Based on our structural and functional findings, we present a Mec1-Ddc2-RPA-ssDNA composite structural model. By way of validation, we show that RPA-dependent recruitment of Mec1-Ddc2 is crucial for maintaining its homodimeric state at ssDNA and that Ddc2's recruitment domain and CCD are important for Mec1-dependent survival of UV-light-induced DNA damage.
Assaf Amitai, Andrew Seeber, Susan M Gasser, and David Holcman. 2017. “Visualization of Chromatin Decompaction and Break Site Extrusion as Predicted by Statistical Polymer Modeling of Single-Locus Trajectories.” Cell Rep, 18, 5, Pp. 1200-1214.Abstract
Chromatin moves with subdiffusive and spatially constrained dynamics within the cell nucleus. Here, we use single-locus tracking by time-lapse fluorescence microscopy to uncover information regarding the forces that influence chromatin movement following the induction of a persistent DNA double-strand break (DSB). Using improved time-lapse imaging regimens, we monitor trajectories of tagged DNA loci at a high temporal resolution, which allows us to extract biophysical parameters through robust statistical analysis. Polymer modeling based on these parameters predicts chromatin domain expansion near a DSB and damage extrusion from the domain. Both phenomena are confirmed by live imaging in budding yeast. Calculation of the anomalous exponent of locus movement allows us to differentiate forces imposed on the nucleus through the actin cytoskeleton from those that arise from INO80 remodeler-dependent changes in nucleosome organization. Our analytical approach can be applied to high-density single-locus trajectories obtained in any cell type.
2016
Jérôme Poli, Christian-Benedikt Gerhold, Alessandro Tosi, Nicole Hustedt, Andrew Seeber, Ragna Sack, Franz Herzog, Philippe Pasero, Kenji Shimada, Karl-Peter Hopfner, and Susan M Gasser. 2016. “Mec1, INO80, and the PAF1 complex cooperate to limit transcription replication conflicts through RNAPII removal during replication stress.” Genes Dev, 30, 3, Pp. 337-54.Abstract
Little is known about how cells ensure DNA replication in the face of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII)-mediated transcription, especially under conditions of replicative stress. Here we present genetic and proteomic analyses from budding yeast that uncover links between the DNA replication checkpoint sensor Mec1-Ddc2 (ATR-ATRIP), the chromatin remodeling complex INO80C (INO80 complex), and the transcription complex PAF1C (PAF1 complex). We found that a subset of chromatin-bound RNAPII is degraded in a manner dependent on Mec1, INO80, and PAF1 complexes in cells exposed to hydroxyurea (HU). On HU, Mec1 triggers the efficient removal of PAF1C and RNAPII from transcribed genes near early firing origins. Failure to evict RNAPII correlates inversely with recovery from replication stress: paf1Δ cells, like ino80 and mec1 mutants, fail to restart forks efficiently after stalling. Our data reveal unexpected synergies between INO80C, Mec1, and PAF1C in the maintenance of genome integrity and suggest a mechanism of RNAPII degradation that reduces transcription-replication fork collision.
Andrew Seeber, Anna Maria Hegnauer, Nicole Hustedt, Ishan Deshpande, Jérôme Poli, Jan Eglinger, Philippe Pasero, Heinz Gut, Miki Shinohara, Karl-Peter Hopfner, Kenji Shimada, and Susan M Gasser. 2016. “RPA Mediates Recruitment of MRX to Forks and Double-Strand Breaks to Hold Sister Chromatids Together.” Mol Cell, 64, 5, Pp. 951-966.Abstract
The Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 (MRX) complex is related to SMC complexes that form rings capable of holding two distinct DNA strands together. MRX functions at stalled replication forks and double-strand breaks (DSBs). A mutation in the N-terminal OB fold of the 70 kDa subunit of yeast replication protein A, rfa1-t11, abrogates MRX recruitment to both types of DNA damage. The rfa1 mutation is functionally epistatic with loss of any of the MRX subunits for survival of replication fork stress or DSB recovery, although it does not compromise end-resection. High-resolution imaging shows that either the rfa1-t11 or the rad50Δ mutation lets stalled replication forks collapse and allows the separation not only of opposing ends but of sister chromatids at breaks. Given that cohesin loss does not provoke visible sister separation as long as the RPA-MRX contacts are intact, we conclude that MRX also serves as a structural linchpin holding sister chromatids together at breaks.

Pages